There are 13 categories for REED. The definitions and meaning of each category are
defined in this section.
TITLE
The complete title listed on the publication will be given. This item can be searched
by all or part of the title.
Example: Achievement Differences on Multiple-Choice and Essay Tests in Economics.
AUTHOR
The author will be listed in the following sequence--last name, first name, middle
name initial. If there is more than one author, they will be listed in the order
they appear on the publication. If no author is listed, the publisher will be listed
as the author. This item can be searched by the last name of the single author or
the last names of multiple authors.
Example: Walstad, William B.; Becker, William E.
SOURCE
The source will usually be the journal in which the study appeared. A complete source
citation will be listed. This item can be searched by journal title.
Example: American Economic Review; Vol. 84; No. 2; pp. 193-196
DATE
The date of publication listed on the journal will be given. This item can be searched
by year of publication. The year is given first and then the period.
Example: 1994, May
LEVEL
This item refers to the educational level at which the study was conducted. The
major categories and subcategories are listed.
Example: Secondary, Senior High School
TOPICS
There are numerous topics which have been written about extensively in economic
education research. Topics are broken into six major topical categories
for this database. In addition these categories are broken down even further to
aid in searching.
Example: Outcomes from Instruction, Measurement Instruments; Courses and Programs,
Senior High Courses and Programs
DESIGN
There are many types of research designs which can be used for studies. Only the
most basic designs are used here.
Example: Non-experiment
SAMPLE
Information on the following factors will be included in the sample information.
Sample Size (e.g., number of students tested), Location for Study, Name of Institution/School,
Unique Feature of Group Tested and approximate time the sample was taken.
Example: 3966, students who took the Advanced Placement Exam in microeconomics and
4,539 students who took the AP exam in macroeconomics in 1991.
MEASUREMENTS INSTRUMENTS
The major economics tests and attitude measures will be categorized in the bibliography.
Also included will be categories for other types of achievement or aptitude tests.
Major Categories
Example: Other, Standardized Test. AP Exam in Micro- and Macroeconomics
VARIABLES
The real strength of the REED database is its listing of variables. This allows
users to limit their searches to specific issues being researched. The major variables
used in the study will be listed in four general categories:
(1) student; (2) teacher; (3) course; and, (4) environmental. If a variable cannot
be categorized it will be listed in the OTHER category. This item can be searched
by variable name.
Example: MJR, AGE, GPA, PROF
STATISTICAL METHODS
The most common statistical methods used in economic education research will be
categorized. The study will be listed under the category or
subcategory for the dominant mode of statistical analysis found in the study.
This item can be searched by category or subcategory.
Example: Regression, OLS, PROBIT
PURPOSE
The basic purposes of the study will be described in a paragraph based on the abstract
or introduction to the study. If possible the author's abstract is used.
CONCLUSION
The major conclusion of the study will be presented as described in the text of
the study. No evaluation or review of the study will be offered.
Complete Example
|
TITLE
|
The Impact of "Trade-offs" and Teacher Training on Economic Understanding and Attitudes
|
|
AUTHOR
|
Walsted, William B.
|
|
SOURCE
|
Journal of Economic Education; vol. 12; No. 1; pp. 41-48
|
|
DATE
|
1980, Winter
|
|
LEVEL
|
Elementary, Intermediate
|
|
TOPICS
|
Courses and Programs, Trade-Offs, Outcomes from Instruction, Attitudes/Opinions/Interests;
Research Questions and Issues, Research Techniques; Methods and Materials, Television/Video
|
|
DESIGN
|
Quasi-Experiment
|
|
SAMPLE
|
563; 5th and 6th grade students in the St. Louis area; 24 teachers
|
|
MEASURES
|
Economics Test, TEE; General Achievement Test, RMC; Attitude Test, Other-US
|
|
VARIABLES
|
TEE, ACH-E, ATT, SEX, AGE, RMC, CONTEXP, TRAINING, PRETEST
|
|
STATISTICS
|
Regression, 2SLS, OLS
|
|
PURPOSE
|
This study addresses three major questions: "First, does the "Trade-offs" series
effectively improve student economic understanding and attitudes toward economics?
Second, what are the marginal benefits and marginal costs of having a trained teacher
in economics use "Trade-offs" rather than an untrained teacher? Third, what does
a simultaneous equations model indicate about the relationship between economic
achievement and attitude?"
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
|
- The "Trade-offs" television/film series appears to have a positive impact on student
achievement and attitude toward economics.
- Trained teachers appear to be significantly more effective in increasing economic
understanding and positive attitudes toward economics in students.
- The 2SLS results, in contrast to the OLS results, show no significant effect of
attitude on achievement.
- Achievement in economics does significantly affect student attitudes toward economics.
|